Legal Opinion

Jiminez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 14, 1997No. 03-96-00177-CRPublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury found appellant guilty of indecency with a child (count one) and aggravated sexual assault (count two). Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 21.11 (West 1994), 22.021 (West 1994 & Supp.1997). 1 The jury assessed punishment for the first offense at imprisonment for twenty years, and at imprisonment for twenty-eight years for the second.

Appellant’s three primary points of error are directed only to the conviction for aggravated sexual assault. He contends the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to sustain the conviction, and that the district court erred by refusing to authorize a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Santellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Otting v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  2. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  3. Benavides v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  4. Cesar Gomez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Campbell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API