Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 16, 1970PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

Upon trial by jury defendant was convicted of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. OB.S 483.992 (2). At the trial the defendant admitted that he was drunk at the time in question, but claimed that he was a passenger, and not the driver of the automobile. Over his objection, his admission (made to the arresting officer immediately following the arrest) that he was, in fact, driving, was admitted into evidence. His objection, in essence, was that he was too drunk to understand the Miranda advice given him by the arresting officer and that, therefore, his waiver of his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. BrewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. McFallArizona Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CoronaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. State v. KrepsHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. Jankord v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API