Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Lindberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 21, 1896No. Nos. 9940-(88)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Meeker county, Powers, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The material allegations of the complaint are stated in the opinions.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Under the terms of G-. S. 1894, § 4218, — which is simply a statement of the common-law rule, — all deeds of gift, all conveyances, and all transfers or assignments, verbal or written, of goods, chattels, or things in action, made in trust for the use of the person making the same, are void as against creditors, existing or subsequent, of such person; and this section applies to real property as well as personal estate. The only question presented by this *477appeal is whether the complaint herein stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action under the above-mentioned section.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wetherill v. CanneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Fullington v. Northwestern Importers' & Breeders' Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Sanders v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. KemperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Stephon v. TopicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Nielson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Johnson v. Union Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API