Legal Opinion

Sgambati v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 3, 1949No. 142, Docket 21194PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The only question here is whether the statute was tolled during the period of infancy. In Osbourne v. United States, 2 Cir., 164 F.2d 767, 768, we said: “Generally, where a statute creates a cause of action which was unknown at common law, a period of limitation set up in the same statute is regarded as a matter of substance, limiting the right as well as the remedy. Filing a complaint within the prescribed period is a condition precedent to recovery, and the cause of action is extinguished after the running of the period. The general rule, developed chiefly with respect…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Osbourne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. TonsellitoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Carolyn Roberts, Individually v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. Mark Pittman, a Minor, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem Milan L. Pittman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. Sword Line, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. Brooks v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API