Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Davidson, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 18, 1960No. 18637PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Doyle.

The plaintiffs in error were defendants in the district court in an action brought by Davidson, Inc., formerly Metropolitan Pontiac, Inc. The parties will be referred to herein as Seller and Buyer or as they were designated in the trial court.

On March 24, 1955, by written contract, plaintiff-seller agreed to sell its automobile dealership to defendant-buyer. The buyer entered into possession on April 1, 1955, and has operated the business since that time. Only one aspect of the contract is in controversy in the present action and that is the provision which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stowe v. Mutual Home Builders Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Empson Packing Co. v. ClawsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Wagner v. HallackSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  4. Ice Service Co. v. Phipps EstatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Tabor v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
  2. Continental Materials Corp. v. Gaddis Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Continental Materials Corporation v. Gaddis Mining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. Nu-Tone Products Co. v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  5. Nu-Tone Products Co. v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API