Furman v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Muscatine District Oowrt. The plaintiff claims of tbe defendant $2,363.90, the alleged value of certain household goods delivered to the defendant in Chicago for transportation to Atchison, Kansas, which defendant has failed to deliver to plain tiff, the consignee. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals. The material facts are stated in the opinion. The case was before ns upon a former appeal. See 57 Iowa, page 42.
1Opinion of the Court
Day, Ch. J.
I. The material facts of this case are briefly as follows: About May 1, 1878, the plaintiff and Oeo. M. i. husbaito agencyfhe-gree'oi evi-aence to es-tabiish. Eurman, her husband, who then resided in Chicago, broke up housekeeping, packed and boxed their furniture and household goods, and stored . them in a warehouse. Evidence was introduced tending to show that the goods were purchased with the separate means of the .plaintiff, and that they belonged to her. Intending to remove to Atchison, Kansas, on the eighth day of May, 1878, tiiey had the goods taken from the warehouse to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McLaren v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
3Cited by4 opinions
- Helwig v. FogelsongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Goodman v. DelfsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Furman v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Furman v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890