Legal Opinion

Francis R. Murphy v. Evan McKnight, et al.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 26, 2026No. 1:23-cv-00588Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION FRANCIS R. MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:23-cv-588 EVAN MCKNIGHT, et al., JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Based on his September 18, 2022, arrest, Plaintiff Francis R. Murphy brought fourteen claims against the various Defendants in this matter. (Doc. 1). Those Defendants—Evan McKnight, Chance Blankenship, Brandon Blankenship, Corey Allison, and the City of Ironton, Ohio—now move for summary judgment on all claims. (Doc. 42). For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. (Doc. 42). As…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API