Legal Opinion

Baker v. Doe

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 4, 1970No. Record No. 7304PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarrico, J.

This is the question presented: May a plaintiff in a personal injury action name as alternate defendants a known person and an *159unknown person1 and allege that the negligence of one or the other, but not both, was the cause of the injury sustained?

The question arose when Thelma D. Baker, the plaintiff, filed a motion for judgment against Ellis Ray Pryor and John Doe, the defendants. The motion alleged that the plaintiff was injured when the vehicle in which she was a passenger was caused to collide with a brick wall after being forced off the highway by “a certain red automobile.” It was then…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Langhorne v. Richmond Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Manassas Park Development Company v. OffuttSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  3. Norfolk Union Bus Terminal, Inc. v. SheldonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. McMullin v. ChurchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1886
  5. Conger v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rasnick v. Pittston Co.Wise & Norton County Circuit Court · 1986
  2. Parrish v. HicksAlbemarle County Circuit Court · 1992
  3. Elizabeth Sines v. Jason KesslerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  4. Elizabeth Sines v. Michael HillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  5. Elizabeth Sines v. Nathan DamigoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API