Legal Opinion

Conger v. Travelers Insurance Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 19, 1963No. 305PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

In considering the ground upon which the demurrer was sustained two statutes are applicable.

G.S. 1-123 provides in part: “The plaintiff may unite in the same complaint several causes of action, of legal or equitable nature, or both, where they all arise out of — (1) The same transaction, or transaction connected with the same subject of action. (2) Contract, express or implied. . . But the causes of action so united must all belong to one of these classes, and, . . . must affect all the parties to the action, and not require different places of trial, and must be separately stated.” G.S. 1-69…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Greensboro Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. ARCADY FARMS MILLING COMPANY v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State Ex Rel. Cain v. CorbettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Grady v. . WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. GULF LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. WatersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Woods v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Dowd v. Charlotte Pipe & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Baker v. DoeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
  4. American Air Filter Co. v. RobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Torres v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API