Legal Opinion

Beaumont v. Samson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1907No. Civ. No. 320PublishedCited by 2 opinions

PETITION for a writ of review to annul a proceeding of the Board of Supervisors of Tehama County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

The petition sets forth that on September 6, 1906, there was filed in the office of the clerk of defendants a petition asking that defendants give notice of an election to be held for the purpose of determining whether the territory in said petition described, including the town of Corning, shall become incorporated under the act approved March 13, 1883. It is set forth in the petition for the writ that in certain particulars, alleged to be essential to the jurisdiction of the defendants to act in the matter, the petition presented to defendants was fatally defective. It appears that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors of San Luis Obispo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Knowles v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Santa Cruz Gap Turnpike Joint Stock Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colthurst v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Millott v. Association of Mare Island EmployeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API