Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Reading Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 29221PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREEDMAN, District Judge.

In this suit for wrongful death under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, plaintiff has filed a motion for the sequestration of witnesses to be examined on pretrial depositions. The witnesses are ten employees of the defendant. The motion falls squarely within Rule 30(b) and we shall therefore treat it as an application for a protective order under the Rule.

Rule 30(b) provides that “for good cause shown, the court * * * may make an order that * * * . the examination shall be held with no one present except the parties to the action and their officers or counsel * *

Th…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. KobliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  3. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Perfect Photo, Inc. v. GrabbDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. OsidachDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Frideres v. SchiltzDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1993
  3. Clark v. Levine (In Re Levine)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1989
  4. Kerschbaumer v. BellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API