State v. Armour Packing Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polk District Gourt.— Hon. W. H. McHenry, Judge. Indictment for the sale of a product in imitation of butter. Judgment of conviction, and the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemed, C. J.
The indictment charges a sale by the defendant of a substance or compound made in the semblance of, designed for and intended to be used in the place of, and as a substitute for, butter, which said substance or compound was not produced from pure milk and cream, although bearing a yellow color in resemblance of true dairy products. The evidence showed a sale by the defendant of a tub or firkin .of oleomargarine. The buyer knew what he was purchasing, and the tub was sealed, labeled, .and marked in every particular as required by statute with reference to the sales of substitutes for butter;…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- The People v. . MarxNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Capital City Dairy Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- State v. BockstruckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Des Moines v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Lever Brothers Company v. ErbeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- Fevold v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- State v. Hutchinson Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- People v. FreemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.