M-B-W, Inc. v. Multiquip, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on a motion for costs and expenses, including attorneys’ and experts’ fees, which represents the culmination of lengthy patent litigation initiated in 2007. Plaintifi/eounterdefendant M-B-W, Inc. (“M-B-W”) seeks an award of litigation costs, including attorneys’ and experts’ fees, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 and/or the inherent power of the court. M-B-W asserts that it is the “prevailing party” in the underlying patent infringement action with respect to defendant/eounterclaimant Allen Engineering’s (“Allen”)…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.