Legal Opinion

M-B-W, Inc. v. Multiquip, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 19, 2010No. Case 07-CV-390Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on a motion for costs and expenses, including attorneys’ and experts’ fees, which represents the culmination of lengthy patent litigation initiated in 2007. Plaintifi/eounterdefendant M-B-W, Inc. (“M-B-W”) seeks an award of litigation costs, including attorneys’ and experts’ fees, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 and/or the inherent power of the court. M-B-W asserts that it is the “prevailing party” in the underlying patent infringement action with respect to defendant/eounterclaimant Allen Engineering’s (“Allen”)…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API