Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dame v. Lefevre

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1947PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRector, J.

The motion to quash was grounded upon the objection that the petition did not state a cause of action entitling the.plaintiff to a writ of mandamus. It has been the long-established practice to question the sufficiency of the petition by such a motion. It is regarded as a general demurrer when made upon the ground specified. State ex rel. Nelson v. Henry (1934), 216 Wis. 80, 256 N. W. 714; State ex rel. Karnes v. Board of Regents (1936), 222 Wis. 542, 269 N. W. 284. Cf. sec. 293.01, Stats. If the petition shows no ground for the issuance of the writ, the motion lies even though, regarded as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State ex rel. Green Bay & Minnesota Railroad v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. State ex rel. Karnes v. Board of Regents of Normal SchoolsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. McIntyre v. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. MajorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Keane v. St. Francis HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. State Historical Society v. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Irby v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API