Legal Opinion

Conlin Greenhouses v. United States Secretary of Agriculture

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 20, 2008No. 1:97-s-01090Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EATON, Judge:

Plaintiff 1 seeks judicial review of the United States Department of Agriculture’s (“Agriculture,” or the “Department”) denial of its application for cash benefits under the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers (“TAA”) program. 19 U.S.C. § 2401e (2002); Pl.’s R. 56.1 Mot. J. Agency R. (“Pl.’s Mot.”). Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to USCIT Rules 12(b)(1) and 56.1, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or, in the alternative, for the court to enter judgment in its favor. Def.’s Mot. Dismiss (“Def.’s Mot.”); see also Pl.’s Resp. Mot. Dismiss (“Pl.’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Donna Kelley v. Secretary, U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Hitachi America, Ltd., Defendant/cross-Appellant, and Hitachi, Ltd., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Parkdale International, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API