Legal Opinion
Johnson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 1978No. 11468 and 12492PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
Appellant was convicted of taking indecent liberties with and enticing a minor. D.C.Code 1973, §§ 22-3501(a), -3501(b). During the pendency of his appeal from those convictions, in which he asserts that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel, appellant filed a motion in the trial court for a new trial alleging, again, that the conviction was incurred without the effective assistance of counsel. That motion was denied without a hearing, and an appeal was noted. The two appeals are here consolidated. We reverse the denial of the post-judgment motion and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Smith v. PollinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Angarano v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Willie A. Womack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Pettaway v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Gibson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Glass v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.