Legal Opinion

Steffey v. King

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1993No. 41A01-9207-CV-246PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Respondents-appellants Aaron, Mildred and Michael Steffey (collectively referred to as the Steffeys) appeal from the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of petitioner-appellee Dr. Pamela Tem-pleton (Dr. Templeton), claiming the trial court erred when it concluded Dr. Temple-ton was entitled to immunity for her actions during child birth pursuant to Indiana's Good Samaritan Law.2

We reverse.

FACTS

The facts most favorable to the nonmov-ing party (the Steffeys) reveal that Mildred was hospitalized at Community Hospital of Indianapolis for Aaron's birth.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beckerman v. GordonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Velazquez Ex Rel. Velazquez v. JiminezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. Beckerman v. GordonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Beckerman v. GordonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Connersville Diagnostic & Therapeutic Center, Inc. v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Steffey v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API