Legal Opinion
Beckerman v. Gordon
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 25, 1993No. 29A02-9207-CV-320, 41A01-9207-CV-246PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOINT OPINION ON REHEARING
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
In our original opinions, appearing as Beckerman v. Gordon (1993), Ind.App., 614 N.E.2d 610, and Steffey v. King (1993), Ind.App., 614 N.E.2d 615, we concluded that neither Dr. Mark Beckerman nor Dr. Pamela Templeton was entitled to the immunity provided by Indiana's Good Samari-tan Law. 1 We now address Dr. Becker-man's and Dr. Templeton's petitions for rehearing for the limited purpose of clarifying our earlier holdings.
Both Dr. Beckerman and Dr. Tem-pleton assert that we misconstrued the legislature's intent when it enacted the Good Samaritan…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hatcher v. Lake Superior Court, Room ThreeIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Tittle v. MahanIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Walton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Baker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Compton v. PletchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holden v. BalkoDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996
- Eric McGowen and Vision Logistics, Inc. v. Bradley MontesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020