Legal Opinion

People v. Easley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 13, 1998No. 98SA77PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This lawyer discipline case comes to us on a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct between the respondent and the complainant. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission was approved by an inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee. It recommended discipline in the range of public censure to a sixty-day suspension from the practice of law. The inquiry panel recommended that the respondent be suspended for sixty days. We accept the conditional admission and the panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1986. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. GoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. People v. BoyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. ShippSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. People v. BengertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Igor Raykin Attorney-Respondent:Supreme Court of Colorado · 2025
  2. People v. RiddleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API