Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rodillo

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 13, 2014No. A14A0967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ray, Judge.

Glenn Smith sued Eugene S. Rodillo, M.D., a urologist, claiming that Rodillo was professionally negligent in failing to examine Smith after he presented at Elbert Memorial Hospital with symptoms which warranted examination by a urologist, and that he suffered damages as a result. Before trial, the trial court granted Rodillo’s motion to exclude certain testimony by Smith’s urology expert regarding the causation and permanence of Smith’s alleged erectile dysfunction. The trial court then bifurcated the proceedings into an initial trial on the issue of whether a physician-patient…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. HNTB Georgia, Inc. v. Hamilton-KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Walker v. Jack Eckerd Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. William Robinson McCormack v. Lauren RhoadesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API