Legal Opinion

Schwarzenberg v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 1, 1925No. C-34PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*902MEMORANDUM BT THE COURT

One proposition, without consideration of any others, is determinative of this case. The authority of the law was to sell certain classes of materials, and it went no further. If *903tbe materials contracted to be sold were in fact nonexistent, there could be as to them no contract of sale.- There was no authority to contract the delivery of materials which the Government did not have.

The plaintiff has failed to prove the existence of the materials, except upon paper in the form of items upon inventories, and upon the whole record the court has concluded that they were…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Condenser Service & Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. S. Silberstein & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Meads v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API