Legal Opinion
Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Grant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 25, 2011PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The appellant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the content of the default notice and claims of violations of the Home Equity Theft Prevention Act (Real Property Law § 265-a) and Federal Truth-in-Lending Act (15 USC § 1601 et seq.) are not properly before this Court.
The remaining issues raised by the appellant have been previously raised and resolved on his prior appeal to this Court from the order dated May 29, 2008 (see Aurora Loan Servs. v Grant, 70 AD3d 986 [2010]). There are no extraordinary circumstances that warrant reconsidering our prior determination (see Pekich v James E. Lawrence,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frackson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Pekich v. James E. Lawrence, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Aurora Loan Services v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fulmer v. BuxenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Grant v. Aurora Loan ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- York v. YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Breidbart v. WiesenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Moran Enterprises, Inc. v. HurstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.