Grant v. Aurora Loan Services
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“Under the doctrine of res judicata, a disposition on the merits bars litigation between the same parties or those in privity with them of a cause of action arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions as a cause of action that either was raised or could have been raised in the prior action” (Barbieri v Bridge Funding, 5 AD3d 414, 415 [2004]; see Matter of Hunter, 4 NY3d 260, 269 [2005]). Here, the causes of action alleging that the defendant Aurora Loan Services (hereinafter Aurora) wrongfully foreclosed on the subject property are barred *950by the doctrine of res judicata (see…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In Re the Estate of HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Baron v. GalassoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Fishberger v. VossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dupps v. BetancourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Pondview Corp. v. BlattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Nassau Operating Co., LLC v. DeSimoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- PNC Bank, N.A. v. RamdassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Myers v. MeyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.