Legal Opinion

McCosh v. Michael Wax

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1923No. Appeal, 271PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Appellant complains of the refusal to take off a non-shit. It was entered for lack of proof of loss. The action was assumpsit for refusal to accept flour alleged to' have been sold to defendant. The contract, tender by plaintiff, and refusal to receive were proved by reading into the record appropriate averments in the statement of claim and the admissions in the affidavit of defense.

In proof of loss, to show the market value of the flour at the breach of contract, appellant offered in evidence paragraph 6 of the statement of claim with the corresponding paragraph of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buehler v. United States Fashion Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Kirk v. Showell, Fryer & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Hanscom Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Wally v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Egner v. McGinnisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API