Winkelbach v. Honolulu Amusement Company
Hawaii Supreme Court
Apeeal prom Circuit Judge, Eirst Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
DE BOLT, J.
Plaintiff having filed his bill in equity praying for the appointment of a temporary receiver to' take charge of the alleged partnership business involved in this suit and for an accounting concerning the same, moved for the appointment of such receiver and his motion háving been denied, he was allowed an interlocutory appeal to this court.
The bill alleges, inter alia, that on March 16, 1911, plaintiff and defendant made and entered into an agreement in writing whereby, as plaintiff claims, they formed a partnership for the purpose of conducting a popularity…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Salter v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Shea v. NilimaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
- Ryder v. WilcoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Barnes v. CollinsHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shinn v. Edwin Yee, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- Dang v. F and S Land Development Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re the Tax Appeal of O.W. Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
- Stanford Carr Development v. Unity HouseHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Television Events & Marketing, Inc. v. AMCON Distributing Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.