Legal Opinion

In Re Pipinos

California Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1982No. Crim. 22122Published

1Opinion of the Court

33 Cal.3d 189 (1982)

654 P.2d 1257

187 Cal. Rptr. 730

In re THOMAS HERCULES PIPINOS on Habeas Corpus.

Docket No. Crim. 22122.

Supreme Court of California.

December 10, 1982.

COUNSEL

Nicholas De Pento for Petitioner.

Quin Denvir, State Public Defender, and Marjorie C. Swartz, Deputy State Public Defender, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.

George Deukmejian, Attorney General, Robert H. Philibosian, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Daniel J. Kremer, Assistant Attorney General, A. Wells Petersen, Harley D. Mayfield and Jay M. Bloom, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

OPINION

REYNOSO, J.

In In…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. MedinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API