Legal Opinion

Goertz v. City of Kirkland

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 15, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00208Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 BRIAN GOERTZ and BENSON CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00208-JHC MAXWELL, LLC, 8 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 9 v. 10 CITY OF KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON; 11 ADAM WEINSTEIN, Planning and Building Director; and DAVID BARNES, Senior 12 Planner, 13 Defendants. 14 15 I. 16 INTRODUCTION 17 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 18 #21. The Court has considered the materials filed in support of, and in opposition to, the motion, 19 the applicable law,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API