Legal Opinion

United States v. Hugo Rincon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1993No. 90-50491PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of reexamining the admissibility of the expert testimony offered by the defendant in light of Dauberb v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). In complying with this mandate, the district court may hold such hearings as it deems appropriate, and shall enter an appropriate order, either affirming its previous rejection of the expert testimony or taking such further action as its decision on that subject indicates.

The district court shall comply with this mandate within a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Hugo RinconCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. NimmerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. Charles GatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  4. (PS) Smith v. BrewerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  5. Holmes v. Nevada Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API