Legal Opinion

People v. Hayden

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1973No. Crim. 6768PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J .

As a result of the holdup of a market defendant was found guilty of three counts of armed robbery. The jury returned special verdicts finding that at the time of the offenses defendant was “armed with a dangerous and deadly weapon, to wit, a pistol” (impliedly evoking Pen. Code, § 3024) and finding also that he used a firearm in violation of Penal Code section 12022.5. The abstract of judgment makes findings which subject defendant to the penalties of sections 3024 and 12022.5. Defendant appeals.

Holdup victims identified defendant as one of two robbers. They…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. NajeraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. RistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. FriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. GiguereSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. People v. DelgadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API