Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Cowan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 14, 2005No. AP-74,368PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion

OPINION ON REHEARING

2Opinion of the CourtHervey, J.

We substitute this opinion for our June 22, 2005, opinion, which is withdrawn on the Court’s own motion for rehearing. We filed and set this case to determine whether applicant should have been released to mandatory supervision and to determine the projected maximum release (or discharge) date on his prison sentence. The former issue is moot because applicant has been paroled. We, therefore, address only the latter issue concerning the projected maximum release (or discharge) date on his prison sentence.

The record reflects that applicant was serving an 8-year sentence for…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MedranoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Ex Parte KuesterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Ex Parte RuthartCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ForwardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Ex Parte CowanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Ex Parte ForwardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Forward, Ex Parte John PatrickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Forward, Ex Parte John PatrickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API