Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCague v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1947No. 28,266Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION ON MERITS.

Gilkison, C. J.

The pertinent part of Rule 1-7 to the instruction complained of, reads as follows:

“The court shall indicate on all instructions, in advance of the argument, those that are to be given and those refused. After the court has indicated the instructions to be given, each party shall have a reasonable opportunity to examine such instructions and to state his specific objections to each, out ©f the presence of the jury and before argument, or specific written objections to each instruction may be submitted to the court before argument. No error with…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. United States v. BreitlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Ala. Great Southern R. R. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API