United States v. St. Clair
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The defendant moves, pursuant to Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to suppress as evidence upon his trial narcotics seized in his apartment during the course of a search following his arrest without a warrant.
It is not disputed that by reason of events relating to a sale and delivery of narcotics on the night of July 10-11, 1968, narcotics agents Bowen and Griffin had probable cause for the defendant’s arrest without a warrant. 1 But the defendant was not arrested until September 18, 1963. Clearly there was ample time during the intervening ten…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Commonwealth v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- United States v. Earl Franklin FlukerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Mose HollandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Gregory K. Eisler, United States of America v. Robert Alan HoffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.