Symorex, Inc. v. Siemens Industrial Automation
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REJECT INTEREST COMPONENT OF PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED JUDGMENT, ENTERING JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND ORDERING DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY RULE 11 SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
ROBERTS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Reject Interest Compo nent of Plaintiffs Proposed Judgment [Doc.# 183-1]. Plaintiff received a jury award of $12,281,817.00 on April 11, 2001 and submitted a Proposed Judgment which includes prejudgment interest in the amount of $8,147,085.52 (calculated from April 12, 1999 — April 27,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Schlaifer Nance & Company, Inc. v. Estate Of Andy WarholCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- General Supply and Equipment Co., Inc. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Yaldo v. North Pointe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Wesley T. Bailey v. Chattem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.