Legal Opinion

Symorex, Inc. v. Siemens Industrial Automation

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 29, 2001No. 99-71803Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REJECT INTEREST COMPONENT OF PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED JUDGMENT, ENTERING JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND ORDERING DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY RULE 11 SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

ROBERTS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Reject Interest Compo nent of Plaintiffs Proposed Judgment [Doc.# 183-1]. Plaintiff received a jury award of $12,281,817.00 on April 11, 2001 and submitted a Proposed Judgment which includes prejudgment interest in the amount of $8,147,085.52 (calculated from April 12, 1999 — April 27,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Schlaifer Nance & Company, Inc. v. Estate Of Andy WarholCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. General Supply and Equipment Co., Inc. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Yaldo v. North Pointe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Wesley T. Bailey v. Chattem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API