Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 30, 1941No. 7672PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

In 1934 one of the appellees, Percy W. Matthews, a mechanical engineer, was the originator of three devices which he wanted to exploit. These consisted of a four-high rolling mill, a flying shear and a heat controlling device. By August, 1934, he had filed applications for patents on the first two devices and was in the course of preparing an application for a patent on the third. It should be pointed out that this was the period in which four-high mills made under the Steckel patents were coming into the market. The appellant, the Continental Roll and Steel Foundry…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Oxborough v. St. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. McGilchrist v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. General Paint Corporation v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Savings & Trust Company, as Successor Trustee for the Alonzo Bliss Properties v. B. Franklin KahnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  2. Commonwealth Film Processing, Inc. v. Courtaulds United States, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API