Matthews v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
In 1934 one of the appellees, Percy W. Matthews, a mechanical engineer, was the originator of three devices which he wanted to exploit. These consisted of a four-high rolling mill, a flying shear and a heat controlling device. By August, 1934, he had filed applications for patents on the first two devices and was in the course of preparing an application for a patent on the third. It should be pointed out that this was the period in which four-high mills made under the Steckel patents were coming into the market. The appellant, the Continental Roll and Steel Foundry…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Oxborough v. St. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- McGilchrist v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
- General Paint Corporation v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Jenkins Petroleum Process Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Savings & Trust Company, as Successor Trustee for the Alonzo Bliss Properties v. B. Franklin KahnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Commonwealth Film Processing, Inc. v. Courtaulds United States, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1989