Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Franklin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 24, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, Lochren, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after a verdict of $1,208.14 for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

In May, 1885, these parties entered into a contract, by the terms of which, for a specified consideration, the defendant undertook, among other things, to forthwith pay to the plaintiff the. *146■sum of $200, in money or in goods, and, within 60 days after the making of the contract, to convey to the plaintiff certain real estate. The payment was not made, nor was the real estate conveyed. This •action is for the recovery of damages for the breach of the agreement to convey the land.

1. The value of the land in question being in issue, the defendant made an offer to prove that he had authorized a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. L'Evesque v. RognrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. H. W. Wilson Co. v. A. B. Farnham & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API