Armstrong v. Ettlesohn
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
At Law. On demurrer and motion to dismiss. Action by David Armstrong, receiver of the Fidelity National Bank, against Beuj'amin Ettelsohn.
1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.
This case is now before me on a demurrer to the declaration and a motion to dismiss. The question raised both by the demurrer and motion is one of jurisdiction of this court. The declaration contains three counts. The first is upon a promissory note of $875, of which there is about $900 now due; the other two counts are the usual common counts for money had and received, and work and labor done, —one charging that the sum of $875 is due for money had and received; and the other, that the sum of $875 is due for work and labor done. The declaration avers that the plaintiff is a citizen of the…
2Cited by16 opinions
- McDonald v. NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Guarantee Co. of North Dakota v. HanwayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Myers v. HettingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Baird v. LeforNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Port Newark Nat. Bank of Newark v. WaldronCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.