Legal Opinion
McReynolds v. Mindrup
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 1, 2002No. WD 60747PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Chief Judge.
Dixie Cranmer McReynolds, Ph.D., and her husband, William R. McReynolds, filed a petition for damages against Jerome J. Mindrup, D.D.S., in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. The McReynolds asserted that Dr. McReynolds had asked Dr. Mindrup to remove an old amalgam filling and replace it with a filling that did not contain mercury because she was afraid of the effects of mercury on her health. The McReynolds claimed that, on October 8, 1992, Dr. Mindrup removed the old filling in an improper manner and that he replaced it with another amalgam filling that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. KinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- State v. BiddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eltiste v. Ford Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. PattonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Day Advertising Inc. v. DeVries & Associates, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Missouri Gas Energy v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. McDonaghSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003