Naftzker v. Lantz
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Monroe; Lockwood, J. Assumpsit by Jacob Naftzker against Henry Lantz,. Gordon Lantz, and Myron Lantz, copartners as Lantz & Co., on a promissory note. There was judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court, and defendants: bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff sued the three defendants,, father and sons, as copartners, in j'ustice’s court, upon a promissory note signed “Lantz & Co.” They appeared by counsel, and plaintiff declared upon the note, filing the-same with the j'ustice at the time of pleading, in conformity to the practice permitted by 1 Comp. Laws, § 836,, which provides:
“ When any written instrument purporting to be executed by one of the parties is declared upon or set off, it-may be used in evidence on the trial of the cause against such party, without proving its execution, unless its execution be denied by oath, at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- People v. JohrMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Polhemus v. Ann Arbor Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Thatcher v. West River National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ensign v. FoggMichigan Supreme Court · 1913