Legal Opinion

Naftzker v. Lantz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1904No. Docket No. 203PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Monroe; Lockwood, J. Assumpsit by Jacob Naftzker against Henry Lantz,. Gordon Lantz, and Myron Lantz, copartners as Lantz & Co., on a promissory note. There was judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court, and defendants: bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff sued the three defendants,, father and sons, as copartners, in j'ustice’s court, upon a promissory note signed “Lantz & Co.” They appeared by counsel, and plaintiff declared upon the note, filing the-same with the j'ustice at the time of pleading, in conformity to the practice permitted by 1 Comp. Laws, § 836,, which provides:

“ When any written instrument purporting to be executed by one of the parties is declared upon or set off, it-may be used in evidence on the trial of the cause against such party, without proving its execution, unless its execution be denied by oath, at…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. People v. JohrMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Polhemus v. Ann Arbor Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Thatcher v. West River National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ensign v. FoggMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API