Legal Opinion
Ripple v. Kuehne
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 5, 1905PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Dennis J.)
1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.
The object of this proceeding is to declare illegal, null and void the following assignment of Baltimore City water stock, No. 5593, valued at $5,000, andstanding in the name ofMary Elizabeth Hax, for life.
The assignment is in the following language:
“Baltimore, March 31, 1894.
“For value received, we, the undersigned do hereby assign, transfer and set over unto Mary E. Hax all our right, title and interest in and to $5,ooo worth of Baltimore City water stock No. 5593, standing in the name of Mary Elizabeth Hax for life.”
This assignment was duly signed by the plaintiffs below, the appellees…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hammond v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- MacKall v. CasilearSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Richelieu & Ontario Navigation Co. v. Boston Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Chase v. WinansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- McCoy v. O'DonnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kinter v. Commonwealth Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Roberts v. CatinoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Sweet v. LowrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Hemrich v. HemrichWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Love v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.