Legal Opinion

Mark Rogers v. E. McDaniel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 16, 2015No. 11-99009, 11-99010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Through its officials, the state of Nevada appeals the district court’s grant of partial habeas corpus relief to petitioner Mark Rogers, a Nevada prisoner who has been sentenced to death. Rogers cross-appeals from the district court’s decision not 'to stay habeas corpus proceedings due to Rogers’s purported incompetency, and also challenges the district court’s denial of ha-beas corpus relief on other claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. ■§§ 1291 and 2253. Because a penalty-phase jury instruction was unconstitutionally vague under law clearly established by…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mark Rogers v. James DzurendaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. John Bejarano v. William ReubartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  3. Rogers v. DzurendaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
  4. United States v. Edgar PogosianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API