Legal Opinion

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

The Chancellor.

The object of this suit is to test the constitutionality of the act of the legislature entitled “An act to authorize the board of chosen freeholders of any of the several counties of this state to lay out, open, construct, improve and maintain a public road therein,” approved April *3999th, 1888. Pamph. L., p. 39. The act provides, that when ■any board of chosen freeholders of any of the several counties ■ of this state shall deem it for the best interests of such county -to lay out, open, construct, improve and maintain a public ■road,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Warner v. HoaglandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Labell v. QuasdorfSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  2. Wilson v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  3. Ex parte ModeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Jersey Downs, Inc. v. Div. of NJ Racing Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  5. Schinck v. BD. OF ED. OF WESTWOOD CONSOL. SCHOOL DIST.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API