Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1983)

Missouri Attorney General Reports

Decided December 29, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Representative Patterson:

This is in response to your request for an opinion as follows:

May a "weekly" paper that has operated as such for many years which converts to a "daily" paper qualify for the three years of regular and consecutive publication required by section 493.050, RSMo 1978, without having to wait three years after having published daily?

Section 493.050, RSMo 1978, describes the type of newspapers in which legal advertisements and notices may be published. That section reads, in pertinent part:

All public advertisements and orders of publication required by law to be made…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Henderson v. ProctorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. Press-journal Publishing Co. v. St. Peters Courier-PostMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. California Press Ass'n v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API