Legal Opinion
Rowe v. United States
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided February 23, 1979No. A76-280 Civil, A76-283 CivilPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FITZGERALD, District Judge.
These two cases, now before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment, manifest a continuing effort by plaintiffs to secure oil and gas leases on the North Slope of Alaska. 1 Plaintiffs are unsuccessful applicants for federal oil and gas leases filed under provisions of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920. 2 The defendants are the United States, the Secretary of the Department of the Interior, 3 and the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, 4 one of twelve Native corporations established by Act of Congress in the Alaska Native Claims…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SloanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rowe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Rowe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. WattDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1982
- Pullman v. ChorneyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
- National Audubon Society v. HodelDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.