Legal Opinion

Polk v. Sleeper

California Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1910No. S.F. No. 5278PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Crawford & Crawford, and Hannon & Hannon, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment that plaintiff take nothing, that the action be dismissed and that, defendant have and recover his costs taxed at $2.25, in an action to determine a contest for the purchase from the state of certain swamp and overflowed land in Lake County, originating in the state land-office between Thomas W. Polk and Horeau Sleeper, and referred by the surveyor-general on June 2, 1886, under sections 3414 et seq. of the Political Code to the superior court of said county for adjudication. The judgment was entered on sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s fourth amended…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dollenmayer v. PryorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Anderson v. YoakumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Wittenbrock v. WheadonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Youle v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Cadierque v. DuranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Reynolds v. Churchill Co.California Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API