Perry v. Weed Chain Tire Grip Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the East-, ern District of Michigan; Arthur J. Tuttle, Judge. Suit in equity by the Weed Chain Tire Grip Company, Harry D. Weed, and the Parsons Non-Skid Company, Eimited, against Arthur S. Perry and Milton H. Perry, doing business under the name of Perry Chain Crip Company, the Union Steel Screen Company, and the Motor Specialty Company. Decree for complainants, and defendants appeal.
1Per curiam
There was a decree below adjudging infringment of all the claims of the Parsons patent, No. 723,299, upon non-skid chains for automobiles. This patent has been the subject of so many reported decisions 1 that it is useless to set out the details of the present controversy. Infringement is not denied The contest is on the issue of validity
If it had been made clear to the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Seventh Circuit, as it now seems to appear from the Scientific American articles, that Thomson’s armor not only really had the creeping motion around the tire, but that he knew and understood…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parsons Non-Skid Co. v. Atlas Chain Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Weed Chain Tire Grip Co. v. Cleveland Chain & Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1910
- Excelsior Supply Co. v. Weed Chain Tire Grip Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1911
- Weed Chain Tire Grip Co. v. Excelsior Supply Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1910
- H. Channon Co. v. Parsons Non-Skid Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Naceskid Service Chain Co. v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924