Legal Opinion

Gipson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 30, 2006No. 1D05-2797Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO CORRECT AND/OR CLARIFY

2Per curiam

We grant appellant’s Motion to Correct and/or Clarify to the extent that we withdraw our previous opinion and substitute the following:

Appellant challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for postcon-viction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, in which he makes numerous claims.1 We reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s claim that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to inform appellant of the potential defenses of entrapment and unwillful violation of his probation.

*677Appellant claims that defense…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brazeail v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Faulk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Lucas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API