Legal Opinion
Board of Education v. Hankins
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 6, 2002PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding to quash a subpoena duces tecum served upon the petitioner in the course of an administrative proceeding pursuant to Education Law § 3020-a against Alfred Hankins, a tenured teacher, the teacher appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), which granted the motion to quash the subpoena.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
A subpoena duces tecum may not be used for purposes of discovery or to ascertain the existence of evidence (see Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042; People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543; Fabbricatore v Lindenhurst Union Free…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In re Terry D.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Oak Beach Inn Corp. v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People ex rel. Martone v. Warden of Queens House of DetentionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Fabbricatore v. Lindenhurst Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Express Property Casualty Co. v. VinciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Capacity Group of NY, LLC v. DuniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- In re Antonia E.New York City Family Court · 2007
- Wahab v. Agris & Brenner, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- New York State Supreme Court Officers Ass'n v. New York State Unified Court SystemNew York Supreme Court · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.