Legal Opinion
Philadelphia, to Use v. Egolf
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 4, 1934No. Appeal, 361PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Maxey,
This is an action of assumpsit by the Northern Paving and Construction Company (hereinafter called the company), in the name of the City of Philadelphia, to the company’s use, under the Act of April 17, 1929, P. L. 527, to recover the amount of certain judgments entered against registered owners of abutting properties, upon municipal liens for paving and curbing.
The company was the assignee of the Montgomery Paving Company (hereinafter called Montgomery), which was the contractor for the City of Philadelphia in curbing and paving in front of certain properties on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Orlosky v. HaskellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- McKeesport Borough v. FidlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Devers v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Barnesboro Borough v. SpeiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Borough of Youngwood v. GaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pentlong Corp. v. GLS Capital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Pentlong Corp. v. GLS Capital, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- McLean v. City of Philadelphia, Dept. of Revenue (In Re McLean)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Carlyle v. City of Philadelphia Water Revenue Bureau (In Re Carlyle)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Capital Asset Research Corp. v. Swinton (In Re Swinton)District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.