United States v. Forney
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The main issue to be decided in this case is whether the government complied with United States v. Goode, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 367, 50 C.M.R. 1, 1 M.J. 3 (C.M.A.1975) when it served the staff judge advocate’s review and record of trial on an attorney who was no longer representing appellant.
Appellant, who pleaded guilty to larceny and robbery was represented at the proceeding below by his retained civilian attorney, Mr. Joel A. Cohen. His detailed defense counsel, Captain G. was not present. The military judge, after finding the appellant guilty, sentenced him to a bad-conduct…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. CaruthU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
4Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. StockenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. JeffersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. WagerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. GarciaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984