Legal Opinion
Rockwood & Co. v. Parrott & Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
Plaintiff is a Delaware corporation with its principal office and place of business in the city of New York, and engaged in the manufacture of cocoa and other products of cocoa beans, including cocoa cake manufactured from cocoa beans.
Defendant is a California corporation with an office and place of business at Portland, Oregon, and engaged in the sale of food stuffs and food products for human consumption.
Barclay, Brown & Jones is a Massachusetts corporation with its principal office and place of business at Boston, and engaged in business as merchandise brokers. ■ ,
On October 27, 1927,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Beggs v. PaineNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Leonard Seed Co. v. Crary Canning Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. MahonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Minneapolis Steel & MacHinery Co. v. Casey Land AgencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hobart Manufacturing Co. v. RodziewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Moore v. Hubbard & Johnson Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Fairbanks v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950
- Rockwood & Co. v. Parrott & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935